ERA
Conference

Towards a 
European 
Research Area

 

Homepage .

Keynotes .

Programme .

Impressions .

Links .

Contact .

 


Fostering Transnational Cooperation in ERA. ERA NETs as new research policy instrument

Dipl. Ing. Mag. Claus Seibt, ARC Systems Research, Seibersdorf

Abstract:

Within European Research Policy in the 6th Framework Programme a new instrument emerged the so called ERA NET. The overall goal going along with this research policy instrument is the co-ordination of national research policy activities to foster the European research area (ERA). The intention of the instrument is to minimize the non-coordination of national research funding activities, causing e. g. the funding of similar research projects in different European countries and with that a probably inefficient accounting of national research funding/ financing budgets.

There is meanwhile a multitude of ERA NET initiatives regarding the cooperation of national research funding activities in areas of basic research and applied research. The clear difference to other European research policy instruments like Technology Platforms or Euroregional Projects is, that not the industry and the research arenas are mainly addressed , but the national research policy and the national research funding administrations. The actual focus of the ERA NET initiatives is to encourage trans-national co-operation of national research programme managers (specifically the so called programme owners are addressed) from national ministries, public funding bodies or research promotion agencies in charge of research programmes.

One of the larger initiatives within the ERA-NET scheme is ERA NET TRANSPORT.
Within ERA NET Transport a large survey was carried out on policy regimes within national transport research policies in 13 European countries and on barriers for trans-national co-operation. The survey illustrated, that there are now structurally similar regimes of public financing/ funding research in European countries (due to something like a mainstreaming process within the ERA), but with a deeper insight different political cultures and practices behind these regimes were obvious.

Within the survey national representatives from the research policy sector of these 13 European countries were asked for their personal estimations on barriers for trans-national cooperation. One major result was that there are not really critical barriers regarding the legal standpoint (e. g. the national research promotion and funding legislation), but there are barriers concerning administrative regulations and even more serious barriers concerning political issues like the legitimisation of national research funding budgets. National research budgets have to be spent with regard to current national political interests.

The ERA NET initiative shows clearly that the emergence of the European Research Area is “non-linear”. Although there is a strong need for better cooperation of national public research funding programmes, national representatives are not in each case interested in a remake of small scale framework programmes (mulitlateral activities). National public research promotion and funding practices stay in some areas competitive, while in other areas a need for trans-national cooperation is obvious. ERA NET and other upcoming instruments to foster trans-national research policy cooperation like Art 169 are still in a process of differentiation to find position within the bunch of all the European Research Policy instruments.